Its Not The Size Of The Lens Its How You Use It

Its Not The Size Of The Lens Its How You Use It

For my birthday this year I want a lens for my camera. The only lens I own at the moment is a 50mm which takes great photos but only if you want close ups.  I want something I can take photos of Lulu doing her gymnastics or Molly in the choir. It should be an easy task right?  Wrong.  I have been doing research on the subject  for weeks and I still haven’t decided on one particular lens.

If I was prepared to trade the car, my first born, or maybe my body I could afford exactly the lens I would like. Well maybe the body trade might be stretching reality a little but the Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM, pictured below, doesn’t come cheap.

This lens would give me the focal length I need and because I would be photographing in fairly dull places it would also give me the wider aperture at f2.8. It is also a luxury model hence the L. It is the combination of these things that makes this ‘the most spectacular lens ever’ or put another way ‘a very expensive lens that I can’t justify buying at the moment’. As it is a luxury model one would think that I could save some money and go for the non-luxury model, right? Wrong, there is no non luxury version. I could buy one for half the price without the IS (image stabilisation) but I need this if I’m using the zoom to its full capacity.

So where does this leave me? Stamping my feet and bellyaching. No, I don’t do that, it’s not my style. I checked out a few alternatives.

The Tamron 70-200mm f2.8 (pictured bellow), has no stabilisation but because of its cheaper price I could invest in a tripod or monopod to keep the camera still.

The Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 (pictured below) does have stabilisation.

 

‘That Nikon Guy’ has great advice including this video which compares the Nikon 70-200 with the Tamron and the Sigma.

I think after consideration I am going to take the plunge and get the Sigma.  That Nikon Guy suggests that it can be slow to focus but I can live with that until I can afford something more substantial. Although not as good as the Canon it is a well-priced alternative that does what I want it to do.

I will let you know when I take the plunge and will share some photos.

If you can give me some advice I would be interested to hear it or perhaps you have bought the Sigma and can let me know how it performs. Don’t be shy, share your thoughts.

 

4 Comments

  1. Alani 5 years ago

    Jane, I have a Canon 70-300 IS and I find it works every bit as good as I need it to. It captures Lilly doing gymnastics and I have used it with her ice skating as well as dancing. If you’re looking for something not quite as pricey I think it’s a good alternative.

  2. Ron 5 years ago

    The new Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS Mark ll USM , just new on the market is by far the best choice.
    But………. you need an extra mortgage on the house !!!
    Serious…. with these 70-200 lenses your are still missing the short area.
    If you have a crop camera maybe also look at the 24-70 Canon 2.8 L

    • Author
      Jane 5 years ago

      Hi Ron, I have the Canon 60D. At the moment I only have the 50mm lens which is great for portraiture. Yes the 24-70 Canon 2.8L is another lens I would like but would not get the shots I would like of the girls at their various events.

  3. Ron 5 years ago

    Hi Jane,
    First before I say something about one of thoose lenes I like to know wich camera do you have???

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*